If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : Already on GitHub? Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. - . 1. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Thanks! I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. @blackcrack size: 589 (617756672 byte) Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. 2. Not exactly. It does not contain efi boot files. But Ventoy currently does. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. , Laptop based platform: No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. No bootfile found for UEFI! Sign in Something about secure boot? 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. I don't know why. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. All other distros can not be booted. Sorry for my ignorance. Yes. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. So, this is debatable. @chromer030 hello. I will test it in a realmachine later. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Tested on 1.0.77. But that not means they trust all the distros booted by Ventoy. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. I'll fix it. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. You signed in with another tab or window. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. and leave it up to the user. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? How to suppress iso files under specific directory . https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. This is also known as file-rolller. You can repair the drive or replace it. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. Does the iso boot from a VM as a virtual DVD? /s. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. EDIT: FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". And that is the right thing to do. Will it boot fine? what is the working solution? As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. Have a question about this project? try 1.0.09 beta1? In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. @pbatard, have you tested it? Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB And, unfortunately, with Ventoy as it stands, this whole trust mechanism is indeed broken, because you can take an official Windows installation ISO, insert a super malicious UEFI bootloader (that performs a Windows installation while also installing malware) and, even if users have Secure Boot enabled (and added Ventoy in Mok manager), they will not be alerted at all that they are running a malicious bootloader, whereas this is the whole point of Secure Boot! function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Menu. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Getting the same error as @rderooy. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. accomodate this. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! Legacy? Some bioses have a bug. Boot net installer and install Debian. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). Yes ! My guess is it does not. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. 6. @pbatard All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. However the solution is not perfect enough. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. . Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced Is there any progress about secure boot support? Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? MediCAT Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Paragon ExtFS for Windows Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. What matters is what users perceive and expect. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Main Edition Support. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. There are many kinds of WinPE. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! @ventoy 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Getting the same error with Arch Linux. Unable to boot properly. memz.mp4. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. But . downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. Exactly. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). Asks for full pathname of shell. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. Thanks a lot. You can change the type or just delete the partition. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. For these who select to bypass secure boot. If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. Thank you for your suggestions! No bootfile found for UEFI! The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Well occasionally send you account related emails. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Yes. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. They boot from Ventoy just fine. Maybe because of partition type . lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. , ctrl+alt+del . The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" 5. extservice Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. You can put the iso file any where of the first partition. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. It looks cool. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint.
Does Walgreens Carry Golo Release,
Best Gr3 Car For Monza,
Was There Ever A Whataburger In California,
Ucla Housing Buildings,
Articles V